

Man, that would be the bloodiest battle the world ever seen


Man, that would be the bloodiest battle the world ever seen
Customary? Yes.
Reasonable? That’s far more complicated. Really depends on your own values


No, to the Christians, it’s not “raping a child” it’s “sex with underage women/females/etc…”
In their religion, it was totally normal to have sex with rape children, even and especially when it’s their own child.
I’m afraid the throttling has just now begun


Did-a-chik?
Bingo! Who knew P.U. could be so based
Buddhism isn’t a religion?


Based on this response, I will not only continue to feed my brain microplastics to help retain plasticity, I will now also ramp up consumption!


Feel so hot like I’m chillin on the beach yeah baby in the sun like the teletubbies…


The smart move is: don’t get your honey where you make your money.
Jane is not interested in an intimate relationship with you. She is being a polite and considerate coworker looking for support from a friendly face. Help her without turning it into more than super and teamwork, and it will eventually just turn into a deeper relationship if she really is into you. If not, then it was never going to anyway.
John is your subordinate. He is reaching out to you with trust for support in this time, but he ultimately cannot get the support he needs in his romantic/personal life from work. If the only thing keeping him there is her then he should leave, and you should support him there. Either make it a place he wants to work at outside of his (AND YOUR) romantic interests or use your professional resources to find him something that is a better fit.
You need to be very careful with both these dynamics.
What would you rather have here: someone looking to build interdepartment trust and friendship and a subordinate who wants to be at work, or a subordinate who feels like you don’t care about him and a coworker who feels like you think so highly of yourself that every girl who talks to you wants to date you?
There is no third option where you get the girl and fix the kid in the situation as you describe it.


Car manufacturers have always overstated mileage ratings because their tests are done in very controlled environs under ideal conditions.
They cannot control how you use their vehicle, but they can baseline it. That’s what those ratings have always reflected, and why. “Here is the way this car performs under ideal circumstances. YMMV”


There is exponentially more wealth in the system than there is currency printed to back it. That is not where the value of our economy comes from. Trade produces wealth, whether from labor or production. Currency just makes trade simpler.


It’s misleading because it is reporting a very generalized average fuel consumption (actual usage) of all PHEVs while manufacturer claims are based on individual vehicle potential.
Manufacturers cannot control how people use their cars, they can only assure that the cars operate the way they claim when used the way they suggest.


Fast car still chokes me up


Ok buddy, I didn’t realize I was talking to an actual nazi or I wouldn’t have even spoke. Anyone who validates literal Hitler isn’t usually worth speaking to… But since it’s already gone this far, I’ll spell out your base fallacy.
Clearly, you’re equating all Jews to the Israelis.
While what the Israeli government is doing to Palestine and is people is a horrific annihilation and atrocious genocide, there is a nuance that you are just conveniently ignoring in order to use explosive rhetoric like that.
There is no such thing as “Jewish behavior”. There are so many different types of Jews and they all behave differently, just like every other group of people.
Sure, Epstein and Maxwell were serving the Mossad. I can see the connection there… and the Mossad are Jewish, as is the IDF.
But you cannot accuse all Jews of being the Mossad of the IDF, that would be like accusing all Muslims of being Taliban. Or all Christians of being Branch Davidians.
Don’t be a cunt.


Some things shouldn’t need to be, but are better marked with a “/s”
That one is Jake, he’s the one in the op at the bottom, with the intolerant opinion. He’s playing a heel character here.
The other is Logan, with the message of tolerance, who is playing a face.
Neither of them is being genuine, they are just looking for attention. Both of them.
Just let me know when the chicken sedan is finally out. 2 doors simply isn’t enough for the amount of birds I’m looking for