I just saw an ad for using ChatGPT to “come up with new recipes and baking ideas”

Yeah I’m sure having a bunch of people decide to eat whatever a hallucinating AI comes up with isn’t going to be dangerous at all…

Yeah, all things considered anyone without a very specific (and nasty) fetish is probably gonna have more luck getting off with a lint-filled dryer vent

Sadly it’s not that common here either TBH. There are lots of places to get poutine, just not so much good poutine

Canada, and still not mandatory here apparently. Which is weird because a lot of our automotive requirements do tend to follow the US due to common production lines and other such factors

Also, while a proctological exam is important at that age, it’s probably better to see a trained MD

Are you sure on the TPMS date? I’ve got a vehicle that’s much newer than 2007 that doesn’t have it

Actually, it sounds to be like sharks might be a pretty good analogy for dealing with the opposite sex

• Know the warning signs of dangerous predators
• Be aware of areas which may be at higher risk of running into said predators
• Know what steps may reduce your likelihood of being attacked, and how to defend yourself

Neither is going to make life 100% risk free, but the appropriate knowledge and steps CAN help reduce risks. It probably also helps to know the difference between the dorsal fin of a shark and a dolphin.

Yeah IIRC emissions shit was like that. So you can get a truck that weighs 2500kg puts out 158g/km of emissions but not an Asian style mini-truck that weighs only 1500kg and puts out i.e. 130g/km of emissions because it’s in the same weight-class as say a Corolla (for which the max emissions might be only i.e. 100g/km)

So the mini truck might produce less pollution than the bigger truck and be perfectly useful for many people, but it’s too much PER WEIGHT and thus doesn’t qualify under the emissions regulations

I’m stuck with it at work and already the bullshit like AI summary etc is driving me nuts

Or possibly if a product gets a lot of reviews in a short time, to prevent review bombing

I see the issue here less as “the kids get nothing” and more a concern at where they money ends up.

Houses get massively inflated over time… Older parents sell, but the money all ends up at some retirement home. Retirement homes are owned by a bunch of hedge funds and/or rich folk. Staff at these places often aren’t paid particularly well either.

The end result is still higher prices for everyone else, while the rich folk get richer as everything rises into unaffordabilty.

He’s a douchebag that’s used to acting as such without consequences (or even with profit). A prison labor camp sounds like exactly the sort of wakeup call this guy needs

That sounds pretty close to what I’d expect, except for it presumably still being tied to the person overall

I think it’s less a matter of “can’t” and more a matter of “can’t … be added to bother putting in a significant effort/investment”

“They used to nervously laugh at me when I farted in their presence, so now I just shit myself defiantly and tell them how nasty they are”

I mean, for the most part yes. I’m not even so much concerned about my kids viewing porn, more so than somebody else will make nasty deepfakes of them and post online etc, so age verification won’t fix that.

I could see it help with discriminating between people at their “own damn computers” and bots or misinformation/psyops campaigns run out of certain foreign countries though (assuming any ID also ties back to parent country).

So uh, do they have a list of domains that should be blocked then? One that we can check out to… uh… ensure our kids aren’t going there and stuff.

It’s a bit of both, but the gender problem is at least partially derived from the fact that the larger portion of assholes at the top are men.

Getting rid of them or clipping their wings would likely be overall better for women. Replacing them with a billionaire-class of women would not.

TBH, there was another guy but he is either dead or disappeared now.

But the factor of whether people get tried for their crimes is much more about wealth and connection than gender IMO. Even in jail she’s given preferential treatment, and I’m sure there are other women who have been involved with Epstein’s Island of evil in additional to the rich men.

Yes. The pedodent is supported by the billionaire class and in turn funnels even more taxpayer dollars to then and his own family. The billionaires in turn help manufacture of amplify the conflicts he feeds upon.