• @someguy3
    link
    1207 months ago

    They have an agenda, so they assume everyone else does too. It’s always projection.

      • UFO
        link
        fedilink
        167 months ago

        Not an agenda people talk enough about

      • @TubularTittyFrog
        link
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        no, because there is no such thing as universal happiness.

        everyone’s happiness is different, and often conflicting.

        for example, my father’s happiness would have been me playing football. I hated sports. hence, he hated me until he died for ‘hurting him’.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          107 months ago

          That really sucks. Can practically feel the tension through your post. What a bummer… shouldn’t kill anybody to let somebody else be happy doing their own thang (and be happy not necessarily copying another person’s thang).

          Less importantly:

          When I think about ‘universal happiness’, I’d think it’s more about creating conditions where everyone has the opportunity to pursue their own version of happiness, rather than imposing a single idea of happiness on everyone.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          This is a strange exclusionary way of considering happiness, tbh.

          Like even if I want, and maybe even would be most happy, to sit down in front of a plate of duck a l’orange for dinner doesn’t mean I can’t or won’t be perfectly happy eating a sirloin steak for dinner instead

          Edit: for clarity, I am referring to your father’s view on happiness, not your response to it