• @Caboose12000
    link
    English
    197 months ago

    Wasn’t this also like the inciting incident for the original jurassic park movie?

    • @Khanzarate
      link
      English
      177 months ago

      Nah.

      That one was dinosaurs changed gender to male, citing the frog DNA they completed the chain with as having that potential.

      So what was supposed to be an all-female park to prevent reproduction became co-ed and then nature happened.

      • @Caboose12000
        link
        English
        8
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m still confused on the difference

        Edit: thank you to everyone who replied, I understand the difference now

        • @Telodzrum
          link
          English
          227 months ago

          Jurassic Park’s version is still sexual reproduction. Parthenogenesis is a form of asexual reproduction.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          217 months ago

          Parthenogenesis - egg just becomes embryo, no male required

          Jurassic Park - one individual turned from female to male and started making babies

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          One was direct development of an egg into an embryo, the other was conversion of an animal from one sex to another to facilitate mating.