@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agoPraise Sheezusmander.xyzimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1780arrow-down112
arrow-up1768arrow-down1imagePraise Sheezusmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-square@KhanzaratelinkEnglish17•1 month agoNah. That one was dinosaurs changed gender to male, citing the frog DNA they completed the chain with as having that potential. So what was supposed to be an all-female park to prevent reproduction became co-ed and then nature happened.
minus-square@Caboose12000linkEnglish8•edit-21 month agoI’m still confused on the difference Edit: thank you to everyone who replied, I understand the difference now
minus-square@TelodzrumlinkEnglish22•1 month agoJurassic Park’s version is still sexual reproduction. Parthenogenesis is a form of asexual reproduction.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish21•1 month agoParthenogenesis - egg just becomes embryo, no male required Jurassic Park - one individual turned from female to male and started making babies
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoOne was direct development of an egg into an embryo, the other was conversion of an animal from one sex to another to facilitate mating.
Nah.
That one was dinosaurs changed gender to male, citing the frog DNA they completed the chain with as having that potential.
So what was supposed to be an all-female park to prevent reproduction became co-ed and then nature happened.
I’m still confused on the difference
Edit: thank you to everyone who replied, I understand the difference now
Jurassic Park’s version is still sexual reproduction. Parthenogenesis is a form of asexual reproduction.
Parthenogenesis - egg just becomes embryo, no male required
Jurassic Park - one individual turned from female to male and started making babies
One was direct development of an egg into an embryo, the other was conversion of an animal from one sex to another to facilitate mating.