Those Silicon Valley geniuses have done it again!

Next week- “it’s like the subway, but with AI!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      218 months ago

      When public transportation was first introduced in most places, it was run by private companies for profit. This changed mostly because it wasn’t profitable to compete with cars when those became popular.

      Of course there still are private companies running public transport: long distance buses and trains in many places, and commercial aviation is really also a form of public transportation.

      So there is nothing novel about buses being run by private companies for profit.

      • @vegetal
        link
        English
        12
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        For me it’s the marketing that makes me roll my eyes. Shuttle instead of bus when in the United States. (Curiously, in other countries it’s called bus by Uber.)

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          108 months ago

          The only time I hear shuttle used is for a thing that transports between two locations specifically. A “shuttle” from the airport to a hotel or whatever, for example. This seems to match the definition of shuttle also, so I think it’s correct. It has nothing to do with marketing, rather actually using the proper term.

          • @vegetal
            link
            English
            18 months ago

            Not to add a wrinkle but a bus also goes between two points.

            • Cethin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              88 months ago

              A bus goes between many points usually.

              • @vegetal
                link
                English
                18 months ago

                Interesting way of thinking of a bus route.