• @Maggoty
    link
    English
    24 months ago

    You’re still using 5,000 year old Armenian shoes?

    Of course not. Stop being reductive.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        English
        24 months ago

        The point is you can reduce anything to its origin. That does not mean it’s still the same thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -24 months ago

          The point is you can reduce anything to its origin.

          Okay, but how does the modern version of cathartic theory differ from what freud postulated?

          I agree you can’t reduce things based on its original alone , which is why I included a scientific source as evidence…

          • @Maggoty
            link
            English
            04 months ago

            I don’t know, that’s why I have a therapist, I’m not educated in psychology. But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -14 months ago

              But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

              I doubt that, so far your argument has been based on the anecdotal fallacy mixed with a bit of the appeal to authority fallacy.

              • @Maggoty
                link
                English
                04 months ago

                Lmao. Says the guy who tried to use a study on aggression to address sexual urges.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  04 months ago

                  Reading comprehension is still hard for you? My argument was about Cathartic theory, which includes several emotions including sexual urges… It is a theory from freud, of course it covers sexual urges.

                  You and the other guy just have no idea what you’re talking about. How about providing any kind of source instead of talking out of your ass?