• @Maggoty
      link
      English
      26 months ago

      The point is you can reduce anything to its origin. That does not mean it’s still the same thing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -26 months ago

        The point is you can reduce anything to its origin.

        Okay, but how does the modern version of cathartic theory differ from what freud postulated?

        I agree you can’t reduce things based on its original alone , which is why I included a scientific source as evidence…

        • @Maggoty
          link
          English
          06 months ago

          I don’t know, that’s why I have a therapist, I’m not educated in psychology. But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -16 months ago

            But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

            I doubt that, so far your argument has been based on the anecdotal fallacy mixed with a bit of the appeal to authority fallacy.

            • @Maggoty
              link
              English
              06 months ago

              Lmao. Says the guy who tried to use a study on aggression to address sexual urges.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                06 months ago

                Reading comprehension is still hard for you? My argument was about Cathartic theory, which includes several emotions including sexual urges… It is a theory from freud, of course it covers sexual urges.

                You and the other guy just have no idea what you’re talking about. How about providing any kind of source instead of talking out of your ass?