The creator of a “FUCK the LAPD” shirt sold out not only his entire stock of that shirt but also sold out many of his other designs after the Los Angeles Police Department Foundation made an intellectual property threat against them that claimed they owned the letters ‘LAPD.’

  • @dohpaz42
    link
    English
    194 months ago

    I’m all for anarchy, and IANAL, but being that there is an active trademark for word LAPD in the clothing industry, I could see the City of Los Angelos (the actual trademark holders) having a leg to stand on. Note that the address on the trademark is not the address of the LAPF.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      534 months ago

      Here’s the thing about Trademarks though:

      Trademarks exist to protect consumers from confusion in the market, NOT primarily to protect the owner of the trademark.

      So, like, a restaurant calling themselves McDonald’s could reasonably be assumed to be operated by the McDonald’s Corporation.

      This makes trademarks distinct from both patents and copyright.

      Do you honestly believe a rational consumer would mistake this design for one originating from the LAPD?

      https://academic.oup.com/book/41769/chapter-abstract/354401357?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false

      ‘’’

      European Trade Mark Law Kur Annette and Martin Senftleben Contents Contents Search in this book CHAPTER 3 Rationales of Trade Mark Protection Get access Arrow Kur Annette, Martin Senftleben https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199680443.003.0002 Pages 1–26 Published: March 2017 Annotate icon Annotate Cite Icon Cite Permissions Icon Permissions Share Icon Share Abstract Although trade mark law is generally regarded as forming part of the larger body of intellectual property, the protection mechanism underlying its functioning is distinct from other intellectual property rights. Patents, copyright, or design rights award creative or innovative achievements with a limited period of market exclusivity thus creating artificial scarcity of the respective commodities. This grants the proprietor of such rights the possibility to raise prices above the marginal costs so as to recoup the investments made. Whether and to what extent that strategy is successful and even allows gaining a premium is determined by the market. Trade mark law coincides with that scheme insofar as it also engages market forces to determine commercial gains or losses. However, instead of creating artificial exclusivity of the goods or services offered, it provides a communication channel for entrepreneurs, so as to identify the goods or services originating from their business, distinguish them from competing goods, and transport product-related messages they want to convey to their customers. This, by reflex, provides information to the market, guiding consumer choice towards goods satisfying their demands, and helping to avoid those they do not want, at minimal search costs (see paragraph 1.08 et seq.). Thus, instead of restricting competition on the production level, trade marks are designed as an enabling tool without which competition in today’s mass markets would not function at all. ‘’’

      • @stoly
        link
        English
        74 months ago

        This is exactly the case.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          I’m conflicted about this. I think some smaller companies that individuals should have the ability to protect their intellectual property but at the same time I think it’s far too long for mega corporations to own IP.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            It’s not something we can do overnight. It would require a strong culture of patronage.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              I agree. I think one thing we can all agree on is that patents that used any, even a cent of public funds cannot be granted a patent. Also at the same time, our government should have their own drug research center that creates drugs that are available for all humanity to use.

      • @Glytch
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        Especially the one in the thumbnail, given that it parodies the Lakers logo as well.