• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 month ago

    50 years? I bet we couldn’t even agree on how to write “11” & “12” on such short notice. (See: date format, encoding, etc)

    • @problematicPanther
      link
      English
      81 month ago

      we could just go with the hexidecimal way and go with A,B,C for 10,11 and 12

      • @chellomere
        link
        English
        151 month ago

        No, 12 in base 12 is 10, not C. But yes, 10 can be A and 11 can be B

          • @marcos
            link
            English
            41 month ago

            Why not?

            Why not use a large prime as the base?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 month ago

              Honnest answer, 1/2 in DEC is 0.5 easy. 1/2 in base 13 is .6666666666… Easy but ugly. You want a base that has comon fractions easily represented by decimals. People like dozenal since many fractions are easily represented. 1/2 = 0.6, 1/3 = 0.4, 1/4 = 0.3

              I’m personally a fan of hexidecimal partly because I’m a programmer and partially because it can be halved several times

              • @bisby
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                Is 1/2 in base 13 not 0.65?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  7
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  No, because the 5 in your answer is thinking in decimal. 0.05 is not the half of 0.1 in base 13.

              • @unreasonabro
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                it’s almost like you’d have to use a different notation system to express a different base…

            • @SmoothLiquidation
              link
              English
              31 month ago

              Ahh yes, let’s introduce floating point rounding errors for one half. Sounds fun.

            • @whotookkarl
              link
              English
              21 month ago

              Why use a fixed base? Or why not use an irrational number like e, the most efficient base

              • @marcos
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I still think some largish prime, like 37 hits the perfect spot of being usable enough for people to use, but still useless enough to stop almost everybody from learning any advanced math.

                But yeah, making integers non-representable is a serious trade-off that deserves consideration.

    • @AdrianTheFrog
      link
      English
      21 month ago

      The current standard seems to be an upside down 2 and 3