• @problematicPanther
    link
    English
    97 months ago

    we could just go with the hexidecimal way and go with A,B,C for 10,11 and 12

    • @chellomere
      link
      English
      167 months ago

      No, 12 in base 12 is 10, not C. But yes, 10 can be A and 11 can be B

        • @marcos
          link
          English
          47 months ago

          Why not?

          Why not use a large prime as the base?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            87 months ago

            Honnest answer, 1/2 in DEC is 0.5 easy. 1/2 in base 13 is .6666666666… Easy but ugly. You want a base that has comon fractions easily represented by decimals. People like dozenal since many fractions are easily represented. 1/2 = 0.6, 1/3 = 0.4, 1/4 = 0.3

            I’m personally a fan of hexidecimal partly because I’m a programmer and partially because it can be halved several times

            • @bisby
              link
              English
              17 months ago

              Is 1/2 in base 13 not 0.65?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                7
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                No, because the 5 in your answer is thinking in decimal. 0.05 is not the half of 0.1 in base 13.

            • @unreasonabro
              link
              English
              17 months ago

              it’s almost like you’d have to use a different notation system to express a different base…

          • @SmoothLiquidation
            link
            English
            37 months ago

            Ahh yes, let’s introduce floating point rounding errors for one half. Sounds fun.

          • @whotookkarl
            link
            English
            27 months ago

            Why use a fixed base? Or why not use an irrational number like e, the most efficient base

            • @marcos
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I still think some largish prime, like 37 hits the perfect spot of being usable enough for people to use, but still useless enough to stop almost everybody from learning any advanced math.

              But yeah, making integers non-representable is a serious trade-off that deserves consideration.