• @techt
        link
        348 months ago

        “Although the water provided to the third party is still being paid for, the water previously provided to the third party for which that third party had not paid remains unpaid and the incentive to pay that debt is reduced,” Court of Appeals Judge John Melanson wrote for a unanimous court. “This threatens the city’s ability to provide low-cost water services.”

        “We depend on fining disadvantaged people for revenue and you will not threaten that.”

        • @afraid_of_zombies
          link
          138 months ago

          Same “logic” is used to stop people from filling up parking meters for other cars.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      188 months ago

      participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector

      Sounds like I can set up a food truck and “sell” water with the whole “pay what you can” model

    • @AIhasUse
      link
      88 months ago

      Yeah, that has to do with not allowing people to try to sway votes as people are going to vote, I think. I can’t find anywhere that even claims anyone in a US state is not allowed to give their neighbor water.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        508 months ago

        No it doesn’t. It has to do with Republicans wanting people standing in line for hours to vote to get thirsty, give up, and leave without voting. This is because (a) Democratic-leaning areas tend to have longer lines for “reasons,” and (b) lower turnout favors Republicans.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          128 months ago

          I believe this was also passed after they unexpectedly closed a bunch of polling places in predominantly Democrat voting areas just days before the Presidential election, which led to lines several blocks long of people standing out in the sun with no shade or access to water or bathrooms.