• @UncleGrandPa
    link
    356 months ago

    Why Are they talking like it’s a bad thing?

    • @stanleytweedle
      link
      English
      206 months ago

      Because it is a bad thing for the financial interests that Business Insider serves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      In isolation, it’s very obviously a bad thing, because it makes solar less profitable and might slow down the switch to renewables.

      In a wider context, it can still be seen as a god thing as it means there has been a significant pivot to solar already and luckily it’s also a very solvable problem. There just needs to be more energy storage.

      • @Shanedino
        link
        16 months ago

        Won’t energy storage help drive prices back up too?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I guess that depends. If the costs to invest in storage is cheaper long term than losing money from excess energy, then energy companies would lose less money and thus could offer cheaper prices. But it would definitely help decrease or get rid of negative prices.

    • @cynar
      link
      English
      16 months ago

      It’s a sign of a grid stability issue. A power grid needs to balance input, output and losses. An imbalance in either direction is bad.

      A negative price means the grid is worried about a collapse. They are willing to pay sinks to come online NOW, or for production to go offline.

      The solution isn’t less renewables however! It’s more storage, and better smarts on the grid. Most grids are poorly designed for renewables, and their loads characteristics. That needs to change rapidly.