I couldn’t find a higher resolution image of is this, sorry.

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    12
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    During the first season of Star Trek The Next Generation, there was never a full-time chief engineering officer for the Enterprise-D. Originally the producers thought that most of the action would take place on the bridge and would rarely go to other areas of the ship, including engineering. The bridge officers would call over the intercom to the other areas and have some voice actor say “Yes sir!” and so forth to save money on new sets. Gene Roddenberry disagreed with this idea and had a change made to the shooting script for the pilot episode “Encounter at Farpoint” to include a scene in engineering; otherwise no engineering set would have been built at all. That set the stage to bring in a new character to act as the chief engineer. Well, it didn’t quite work out as planned at first.

    https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/chief_engineers_tng.htm

    Now I don’t know where they got that from, but that website is generally a reliable source. But I was wrong, it wasn’t Gene.

    • @aeronmelon
      link
      36 months ago

      So why would I blame Roddenberry if Roddenberry is the reason the Engineering set got built?

      Your previous comment made it sound like he was against the idea of going to Engineering.

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        56 months ago

        My edit must not have gone through. I forgot to add that I was wrong and it wasn’t Roddenberry and edited my comment, but it didn’t go through to you fast enough I guess. Sorry.

        • @aeronmelon
          link
          46 months ago

          Okay. The idea that they didn’t want to film in Engineering really confused me. Because Encounter At Farpoint made a big show of Picard walking the entire set from top to bottom.

          It makes a lot of sense that Roddenberry himself vetoed that idea.

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            36 months ago

            I had always heard it was Roddenberry that said no Engineering set, but this does make more sense.

            • @aeronmelon
              link
              26 months ago

              Maybe Roddenberry’s PoS lawyer…

              • Flying SquidM
                link
                3
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I’m guessing Paramount producers in this case, but it’s hard to know. It seems to me that Maizlish was more about just doing things his way rather than saving the studio money.

                And in the end, they just redressed one of the movie sets as Enterprise-D Engineering and saved money anyway.