• @Aux
    link
    16 months ago

    There should be no pro gun parties.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      06 months ago

      Agreed.

      There should also be no violent crime. No assault, rape, murder. No beatings, stabbings. No kidnappings, armed robberies, burglaries, arsons. No suppressiin of dissidents. No invasions or genocides.

      And when we finally achieve all of those, I fully agree: there should be no guns.

      Until that day, every political party should be pro-gun.

      • @Aux
        link
        -26 months ago

        Lol no. You won’t be getting a reduction in crime without a reduction in firearms.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          How does that work?

          I mean, the overwhelming majority of violent crimes are committed without the perpetrator being armed with a gun.

          Are you under the impression that the mere existence of guns leads people who don’t have them to commit violent crimes? What is the mechanism by which guns drive violent criminals without guns to violently crime?

          • @Aux
            link
            -36 months ago

            There are more mass shootings in the US every week than there were in the whole of Europe in the last decade.

              • @Aux
                link
                -36 months ago

                So mass shootings are not a crime. I see…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              The fact that Ukraine is in Europe tells me that is untrue. Or did you forget that I included suppression of political dissidents, invasions, and genocide among my reasons for an armed populace?

              • @Aux
                link
                -66 months ago

                Wut?