• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    06 months ago

    Agreed.

    There should also be no violent crime. No assault, rape, murder. No beatings, stabbings. No kidnappings, armed robberies, burglaries, arsons. No suppressiin of dissidents. No invasions or genocides.

    And when we finally achieve all of those, I fully agree: there should be no guns.

    Until that day, every political party should be pro-gun.

    • @Aux
      link
      -26 months ago

      Lol no. You won’t be getting a reduction in crime without a reduction in firearms.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        How does that work?

        I mean, the overwhelming majority of violent crimes are committed without the perpetrator being armed with a gun.

        Are you under the impression that the mere existence of guns leads people who don’t have them to commit violent crimes? What is the mechanism by which guns drive violent criminals without guns to violently crime?

        • @Aux
          link
          -36 months ago

          There are more mass shootings in the US every week than there were in the whole of Europe in the last decade.

            • @Aux
              link
              -36 months ago

              So mass shootings are not a crime. I see…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The fact that Ukraine is in Europe tells me that is untrue. Or did you forget that I included suppression of political dissidents, invasions, and genocide among my reasons for an armed populace?

            • @Aux
              link
              -66 months ago

              Wut?