@[email protected] to politics English • 6 months agoTrump told donors he will crush pro-Palestinian protests, deport demonstrators | Speaking to wealthy donors behind closed doors, he said that he supports Israel’s right to continue “its war on terror.wapo.stmessage-square319fedilinkarrow-up1617arrow-down115
arrow-up1602arrow-down1external-linkTrump told donors he will crush pro-Palestinian protests, deport demonstrators | Speaking to wealthy donors behind closed doors, he said that he supports Israel’s right to continue “its war on terror.wapo.st@[email protected] to politics English • 6 months agomessage-square319fedilink
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette link-8•edit-26 months agoshe’s not a russian asset. this is libel. edit have fun with this comment chain. it’s a wild ride.
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette link-2•6 months agoyou think she can use every internet commenter? when someone lies about you, you run right to your lawyer?
minus-square@FiremanEdsRevengelink3•6 months agoNo, if it were libel, there wouldn’t be articles posted about it.
minus-square@FiremanEdsRevengelink3•6 months agoA quick Google search could’ve answered that question for you. you’re not arguing in good faith, but I’ll still throw ya a bone. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna951166 https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/19/politics/jill-stein-responds-clinton-gabbard-russian-asset-cnntv/index.html https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/466594-jill-stein-i-am-not-a-russian-spy/amp/
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette link-2•6 months agocnn and the hill links 404. the NBC news link does not say she is a Russian asset
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette link-2•6 months agooh. weird. I got em to work. both of those articles are just her saying it’s not true. they are not evidence she is a Russian asset.
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette link-2•6 months agoshed sue hilary clinton? the articles you linked are careful not to level the accusation in editorial voice. what makes you think Jill Stein would prevail in a suit against hilary on any grounds?
she’s not a russian asset. this is libel.
edit
have fun with this comment chain. it’s a wild ride.
If that were the case, wouldn’t she have sued?
you think she can use every internet commenter? when someone lies about you, you run right to your lawyer?
No, if it were libel, there wouldn’t be articles posted about it.
which one?
A quick Google search could’ve answered that question for you. you’re not arguing in good faith, but I’ll still throw ya a bone.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna951166
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/19/politics/jill-stein-responds-clinton-gabbard-russian-asset-cnntv/index.html
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/466594-jill-stein-i-am-not-a-russian-spy/amp/
cnn and the hill links 404. the NBC news link does not say she is a Russian asset
oh. weird. I got em to work. both of those articles are just her saying it’s not true. they are not evidence she is a Russian asset.
Exactly. If it were libel, she’d sue.
shed sue hilary clinton? the articles you linked are careful not to level the accusation in editorial voice. what makes you think Jill Stein would prevail in a suit against hilary on any grounds?