• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    47 months ago

    More fuel efficient in the sense that they use the same amount of fuel to move more weight around.

    Want safety features in your car? That’s the price to pay, it will be heavier than a tin can from the 80s.

    • DacoTaco
      link
      67 months ago

      Euh, no. Used to have a renault clio, which was a lot safer than a car from the 80’s like, lets say, a vw beetle. Lighter too, as back then cars were mostly made of steel, while its a combination of steel, aluminium and plastic now.
      Same size of car too, so size doesnt matter either.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -17 months ago

        1990 Clio 930kg vs 2020 Clio 1090kg

        1985 Polo 730kg vs 2020 Polo 1181kg vs 2020 Lupo 975kg (the Lupo is actually smaller)

        1980s Corolla 940kg vs 2020 Corolla 1395kg

        Need me to go on?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      We make a 2 ton metal box, cruising at 70mph, and driven by basically anyone. The only way to do this while having a reasonable level of safety is to cram it full of features that make it heavy and expensive. This is fundamentally terrible.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        People’s needs for transportation will never cease to exist and there will always be some people that will need individual transportation so even in a world where only those who need a vehicle have one, I think it’s only fair that they should be as safe as possible in it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          That’s fine; there’s always special accommodations needed. Can we stop making it the default?