• @ikidd
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Oh, bullshit. They were fine before the Fiat takeover.

      I have 500k on a 98 GC 5.9L and 350k on the wife’s 98 4.0L. I doubt they’ve been down for 5 days total in this millenium and both are driven every day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 month ago

      I’ve never owned one, but I thought they were more reliable in the 1980s and '90s. Was I mistaken?

      • @gdog05
        link
        101 month ago

        Up to being bought by Chrysler in 1984 they were pretty solid. Because they were so basic. Not much to break, since they were boxes with wheels and that’s it. I had a 1990 YJ Wrangler and it was the biggest pile of shit I could imagine being assembled on purpose.

        • @mipadaitu
          link
          English
          81 month ago

          In the 80’s and 90’s? That was peak junk car era. You’d be lucky to have a car not rust out or need major repairs well before 100k miles.

          These fays, IF something breaks, it is extremely expensive to fix, but you can certainly expect to go a lot longer without a major problem.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            Nah it was peak technology. We got things like fuel injection and ABS. There were standard radios. Components were simple, easy to diagnose, and inexpensive.

    • @assembly
      link
      31 month ago

      The Wranglers have been mostly reliable but everything else has had issues. The newer pentastar engines seem to be doing pretty well. Not sure on the latest 4 cylinder engines or the Fiat models but the wrangler has been going pretty strong.

      • @QuarterSwede
        link
        31 month ago

        The 3.6L Pentastar is widely known to have the head gasket leak after 100K miles. Should be a recall but Stellantis won’t recognize it.

        • @assembly
          link
          11 month ago

          I thought that was limited to the Pacificas and everything else before they put it into the Wrangler. My understanding was that it was resolved by the time they finally started putting them in wranglers. I hated the older 3.8L engines and was super happy to get the 3.6. I still have low mileage so can’t comment on longevity but I think they may have resolved that.

          • @QuarterSwede
            link
            21 month ago

            Nope. Still a thing. Happened to my 7 year old.

            • @assembly
              link
              11 month ago

              How many miles did it have and if you don’t mind me asking, what did it cost to fix? Did you just get the head gasket replaced or did you have to get the heads machined or a reman engine?

              • @QuarterSwede
                link
                21 month ago

                115K. Totaled the engine. Too far out of spec to machine. I wasn’t about to put more money into it. It was paid off too which sucked. Found out after the fact that this is a known defect on this engine. Note: it was not a Flex Fuel vehicle, or at least it wasn’t badged that way. Not sure if that affects anything reliability wise.