If so, then why?

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I would say just don’t break any laws then, but laws can change and people are terrible.

    Edit: Pretty sure you’re all downvoting a misunderstanding.

    I’m saying I get why it’s a thing because people would convict their opponents. Not that I was actually saying well don’t break any laws.

    • @Pronell
      link
      957 months ago

      Sure, but a corrupt government can fabricate evidence to keep their enemies silenced.

      Look at Russia and their treatment of Alexei Navalny.

        • @Gigan
          link
          -217 months ago

          Or the topic of this post

          • @eltrain123
            link
            87 months ago

            Might be a reasonable argument if you didn’t have 76 years of his rotten behavior as precedent in processing the decision made by a jury of his peers…

    • @NeoNachtwaechter
      link
      97 months ago

      just don’t break any laws then

      A very naïve idea :-(

      • @lolrightythen
        link
        27 months ago

        Especially when you get into archaic laws that aren’t enforced or widely known.