• @RestrictedAccount
    link
    3726 days ago

    Why did they say “false statement” when “lie” is much more efficient?

    • Admiral Patrick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      To call something a lie, the media outlet has to know, 100%, that the speaker knows it’s a lie. It’s difficult to impossible to meet that threshold in pretty much all cases.

      A false statement is an untruth — a lie that could have resulted from an honest mistake, poor fact-checking, negligence, or just plain bad luck / stupidity.

      People may say something that is known to them as the truth, but is not necessarily the objective truth as known by others. In that case, they would be making unwitting false claims. i.e. “it’s not a lie if you believe it”

      Basically it comes down to liability. If a media outlet directly calls something someone says a lie, they’re going to get sued.
      And Cheeto is a walking SLAAP lawsuit.

      • @barsquid
        link
        526 days ago

        He won’t sue. If he sues they can subpoena and reveal that in private communications he admits the truth.

        • Admiral Patrick
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          I mean, a smart person (or a dumb person who at least listened to the advice of their lawyers) wouldn’t sue in that scenario. But this is Trump we’re talking about, lol, so I’m less convinced.

          • @RestrictedAccount
            link
            326 days ago

            Yes, but that would sink him if he did.

            I would throw a few bucks in for their defense fund.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        126 days ago

        I don’t know what the law says, but it seems to me you can tell a lie without lying. If I hear a lie and then repeat it, transitive property, baby.

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      926 days ago

      Honestly even that much is a big step for the New York Times. I’m a little surprised they’re not trying to “both sides” it.

      • ares35
        link
        fedilink
        926 days ago

        the news on regular tv last night was totally lopsided. tons of ‘reaction’ from the right and far-right, hardly anything from anyone else.

        • mozz
          link
          fedilink
          1126 days ago

          The news on regular TV is almost all bought and paid for by Sinclair / Fox / whatever other explicit propaganda outlet. The people reading that bullshit may hate it a lot more than you do, but they may be contractually obligated to go up and say it. It’s real fucked up.

      • @RestrictedAccount
        link
        126 days ago

        True dat.

        I am surprised they didn’t get a jab about Biden’s age in there.

    • blargerer
      link
      fedilink
      526 days ago

      Best guess? Just avoiding being sued. Something being a false statement is a matter of fact that’s easily proven. Something being a lie requires proving state of mind. In the US I can’t imagine actually winning such a suit, but its still safer to cover asses.