• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      236 months ago

      I did. XD. I did it on duckduckgo with safe search turned off and didn’t even find anything. Was a little disappointed tbh. Apparently nobody wants to see porn of Trump. But rule 34 states that if it exists theres porn of it. So if there’s no porn of Trump does that mean he’s not even real? o.O

          • @harmsy
            link
            106 months ago

            It’s a link to the website’s front page, not the offending images.

              • @Psythik
                link
                86 months ago

                Bruh this is one of the most well-known porn sites in existence. Don’t pretend like you’ve never heard of it. (You might be one of today’s lucky 10,000, I suppose.)

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  26 months ago

                  I would be one of the lucky 10,000. But I’ll pass this time. I know plenty of porn sites (youporn, pornhub, etc… Most of the well known ones), but that one is new. I’ll pass for now. Maybe later, ok?

          • @Psythik
            link
            56 months ago

            You’ve seriously never been there? It’s a staple of internet porn, along with the porntubes like XVideos and PornHub.

            If you can’t find it anywhere else, you can find it on rule34.paheal. Only downside is that it’s mostly pictures/drawings. There are some videos but they tend to be short animations.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          I clicked and got redirected to france gov website telling me this website contains pedopornography. I’m not going to investigate to find out if it’s true, please remove the link.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      When I read your post I saw the “head weasels” as a few tiny little cute C-suite assholes wearing little suits. They’ve been the top dogs (tiny ones) for so long that they’re completely out of touch with the ordinary fuzzball.

      But yeah a different interpretation makes much more sense in context.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Weasels aren’t dogs. They’re both caniformes so I understand the mistake, but I thought it best that you be made aware.