CaptainBasculin to [email protected] • 4 months agoWhich adaptation do you think has surpassed its source material in quality?message-square138fedilinkarrow-up199arrow-down17
arrow-up192arrow-down1message-squareWhich adaptation do you think has surpassed its source material in quality?CaptainBasculin to [email protected] • 4 months agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-squareAlphaOmegalink2•4 months agoIt’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire. Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire
minus-square@VelvetStormlink3•4 months agoOmg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.
minus-square@AngryCommieKenderlink2•4 months agoIt’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "
It’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire.
Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire
Omg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.
It’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "