• aasatru
    link
    fedilink
    1626 days ago

    Well, it does make sense, doesn’t it?

    What we’re interested in is not the number of users, but the trends: whether the number is increasing or decreasing over time. Starting the axis at 0 would not be useful in this regard, as the trend would be almost completely obscured.

    • @givesomefucks
      cake
      link
      English
      326 days ago

      For something like that, you need a special graph, and I forget the name because no one uses it.

      Y axis is “percent growth” and the X axis isn’t at the bottom, it’s in the middle.

      Like, the only way I can describe it is a line graph because it technically is, but there’s some name done it.

      Capitalism doesn’t like it tho, because there’s “red numbers” and red numbers scare investors

      • aasatru
        link
        fedilink
        126 days ago

        At some point recognisability is also worth something. I can immediately read this graph, I understand it, it’s good.

        Occasionally it’s used in a confusing way where people assume it starts at zero despite it not being the case, and sometimes intentionally so. But that’s just the case here.

    • @Windex007
      link
      English
      326 days ago

      If the goal is to visualize growth trends, I don’t think raw user counts are the correct value to track on the Y-axis at all. That’s where my head was at when I said it doesn’t make sense. Abusing the Y-axis to try and coax data out in this case is just a symptom of having the wrong measure.

      Daily new users. Percent user growth.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        426 days ago

        There is visible growth in posts and comments, which is good. However, I’ve also started seeing spam posts.