The former president complained that his sentencing is set to take place days before the Republican National Convention

Donald Trump says he wants the Supreme Court to intervene in his upcoming sentencing on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

“The ‘Sentencing’ for not having done anything wrong will be, conveniently for the Fascists, 4 days before the Republican National Convention,” Trump wrote Sunday night on Truth Social, complaining that Judge Juan Merchan was an “‘Acting’ Local Judge, appointed by the Democrats, who is HIGHLY CONFLICTED” to “make a decision which will determine the future of our Nation.”

“The United States Supreme Court MUST DECIDE!” Trump added in an appeal to the nation’s highest court.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    327 months ago

    Wouldn’t it be the NY Superior Court here and probably never make it to the actual US Supreme Court?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      427 months ago

      Technically the US supreme court can stick their dick in anything, there’s a legal option that allows them to just cut in whenever they feel like it.

      There’s no regular appeals process that reaches the US federal supreme court for a New York state criminal case though.

      • @dhork
        link
        English
        387 months ago

        As far as I know, the Supreme Court can’t get involved in a state matter until all appeals in that state have been resolved, and even then won’t take up the matter unless there is some connection to Federal law (and that connection was raised at some point in the trial by one of the parties).

        But this court might invoke the ancient rite of “Because I said so” to justify letting Trump off the hook, I suppose.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          167 months ago

          I think the Florida Supreme Court was still dealing with Bush v Gore when the Supreme Court jumped in. Although, I guess that one did have a more direct relationship to Federal law. But it was 100% bullshit, regardless.

          • @bazus1
            link
            English
            157 months ago

            Ah yes, Bush v Gore. I’m fairly certain that Y2K is where our current shitty timeline diverged from the good one.

            • r00ty
              link
              fedilink
              107 months ago

              No, it was 2012. The mayans were totally right, it just wasn’t the sudden flip switch end of days people expected. :p

            • Flying Squid
              link
              27 months ago

              That’s when the Matrix glitched out and now we’re all living in human battery hell.

              • @bazus1
                link
                English
                37 months ago

                “Mr. Architect, please, try the Utopia setting again. I promise we won’t reject it!”

                • themeatbridge
                  link
                  17 months ago

                  If that wasn’t tbe most boomer bullshit. “We met everyone’s needs, and people still weren’t happy.” Fuck outta here, like you couldn’t drop every person who ever lived naked on a beach with margaritas and nachos for them to spend eternity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/types-cases/appeals

          A litigant who loses in a federal court of appeals, or in the highest court of a state, may file a petition for a “writ of certiorari,” which is a document asking the Supreme Court to review the case.

          So yes, they can’t do it until all normal avenues are exhausted. I’m not sure it is required to have anything to do with federal law though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          As far as I know, the Supreme Court can’t get involved in a state matter until all appeals in that state have been resolved, and even then won’t take up the matter unless

          This is only because how the process normally works. But if they really wanted to get involved there’s not really much that could stop them

    • @NocturnalMorning
      link
      77 months ago

      Yeah, the Supreme Court has nothing to do with this case and can’t do anything about it.

      • themeatbridge
        link
        17 months ago

        Right, but you’ve forgotten the old laws of “Fuck you, poors.”