• @NOT_RICK
    link
    English
    516 months ago

    “With Coca Cola, for example, they said: Why should we use a glass that doesn’t break? We make money with our glasses. […] The dealers said understandably: Who would saw off the branch he was sitting on?”

    Capitalism strikes again

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Isn’t this similar to the light bulb situation? Whereby making light-bulbs more fragile, and less reliable they increase the sales profits?

      • Rhaedas
        link
        fedilink
        196 months ago

        The Phoebus cartel, the beginnings of planned obsolescence.

        The amazing thing is how not only did a long lasting light bulb get designed early on, but that the later bulbs were designed to fail specifically after a given point (1000 hours). That’s precision.

        I also blame Edward Bernays, the father of consumerism/consumption.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 months ago

        I found this to be a great video discussing why lightbulbs are engineered the way they are. TLDR: reducing lifespan increases efficiency and light quality

      • @PunnyName
        link
        English
        36 months ago

        They used to simply last longer, too. Fragility be damned.

          • @Plopp
            link
            English
            86 months ago

            I want to start a company that focuses on creating shit that lasts. Ain’t nobody getting rich off of my company, but the people get goods that they’ll never have to replace, basically. Sadly I’ve got ADD so this will never happen, I’m sorry y’all.