@[email protected] to New York Times gift [email protected]English • 4 months agoN.Y.P.D. Moves to Revoke Trump’s License to Carry a Gunwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1113arrow-down12
arrow-up1111arrow-down1external-linkN.Y.P.D. Moves to Revoke Trump’s License to Carry a Gunwww.nytimes.com@[email protected] to New York Times gift [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•edit-24 months agoChapter 44 of Title 18 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), federal law bans convicted felons from possessing firearms or ammunition. Yes he should have his license to carry revoked, but he should also be barred completely from owning any firearms/ammo as I understand the law. Not that the law gets applied to him the same as it would be applied to you or I…
minus-square@HeyThisIsntTheYMCAlinkEnglish1•4 months agoI get no right is unlimited. This is the one infringement the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED crowd seems to be okay with. Did they already change their mind or are they working around to it?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•4 months agoWe take rights away from people all the time as a punishment for their crimes. Why would this be any different?
Chapter 44 of Title 18 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), federal law bans convicted felons from possessing firearms or ammunition.
Yes he should have his license to carry revoked, but he should also be barred completely from owning any firearms/ammo as I understand the law.
Not that the law gets applied to him the same as it would be applied to you or I…
I get no right is unlimited. This is the one infringement the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED crowd seems to be okay with. Did they already change their mind or are they working around to it?
We take rights away from people all the time as a punishment for their crimes. Why would this be any different?