• @buzz86us
    link
    486 months ago

    I like the idea of conservatism, but not the way it is executed… Like why aren’t these people for conservation of the environment, or actually financially conservative? All I’m noticing is greed, and corporate corruption.

    • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
      link
      726 months ago

      Because by “conserve” they mean conserve the status quo.

      Rich people stay rich poor people stay poor and anyone who tries to change that is a commie.

        • @RememberTheApollo_
          link
          116 months ago

          The status quo can include trends, it doesn’t necessarily mean a static state. “If the status quo is me getting [richer, more powerful, more control], then that’s the one I want.”

        • @stormeuh
          link
          56 months ago

          I.e. conservation of momentum not velocity

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      146 months ago

      It seems useful to note that the EPA was signed into law by Nixon. We have fallen a long way since Reagan took office.

      • @Burn_The_Right
        link
        206 months ago

        The EPA was the idea of the progressives who seemed to have some momentum toward eventually achieving it. The conservatives (and their polluting corporate benefactors) were threatened by it. So, Nixon co-opted it while conservatives were still in power with the purpose of making sure it was ineffective. They achieved that.

        You’ll notice that when conservatives have power, they castrate the EPA and make sure it does not affect any of their benefactors. The Dem neo-liberals usually bend a little toward the progressives and will re-instate some of the EPA’s power when the Dems are in charge, but it’s never enough to undo whatever damage the last GOP administration did. This is because neo-liberals are conservatives. (They aren’t as conservative as Republicans, but they are conservative by every international standard.)

        Do not give credit to Nixon for the EPA. Like everything else ever done by a conservative, it was an act of self-serving deception. Nothing good in all of human history has ever come from conservatism. Nothing at all.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          56 months ago

          In the US: regulatory capture is a such a bipartisan effort you can call it non-partizan unironically.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          I totally agree that conservatives and conservatism don’t get the credit. However, it’s a pretty stark contrast with the situation today where progressives are only marginally capable of bullying the Democrats. Today’s Republicans consider cooperation with progressives to be political suicide.

    • @UnaSolaEstrellaLibre
      link
      English
      96 months ago

      They only thing they want to conserve is their capital/social status.

    • pachrist
      link
      36 months ago

      Conservatism has been those things many times and in many places. It’s traditionally moderate liberalism. Conservatism in the US today is regressivism wearing a conservative hat for branding. Were the Nazis socialists? No, but it was in their name. Are conservatives conservative? No, they’re authoritarian regressivists, because the goal isn’t to be conservative. It’s to be anti-progressive. But the conservative hat gives it recognizability and credibility.