But this isn’t

  • @Korne127
    link
    645 months ago

    when no law is on the books stating otherwise

    There actually is one (even a constitutional amendment). It was introduced after Franklin D Roosevelt’s served a third and a fourth term.

    • ignirtoq
      link
      fedilink
      265 months ago

      That’s part of what makes Trump’s talk of a 3rd term both ridiculous and terrifying. It would violate the Constitution, so a radical change to our country would have to happen for that to happen. All of our “inalienable rights” are guaranteed by the Constitution, so if they throw it away for a 3rd Trump term, they can throw it away for anything else they want. Want to go back to only white men who own land voting? It’s the Constitution blocking that. Making treason a crime? The Constitution. Once they break that, we’re hosed.

      • @dil
        link
        135 months ago

        They’re already throwing out the Constitution. Fourteenth amendment says he’s ineligible to be president because of the insurrection.

        • @elephantium
          link
          English
          105 months ago

          That should have been a slam dunk impeachment conviction. That the discussion even gets to the 14th makes me weep for the country I thought I grew up in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        This isn’t new at all, so if anything ignoring the 22nd is just furthering the current trajectory of decline imo. What happened to our “inalienable right” to privacy, supposedly guaranteed by the 4th amendment, after 9/11 and the ensuing bipartisan surveillance bill known as the Patriot Act?

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        15 months ago

        It would violate the Constitution

        Hardly the first time we’ve done that in this country.