But this isn’t

  • ignirtoq
    link
    fedilink
    266 months ago

    That’s part of what makes Trump’s talk of a 3rd term both ridiculous and terrifying. It would violate the Constitution, so a radical change to our country would have to happen for that to happen. All of our “inalienable rights” are guaranteed by the Constitution, so if they throw it away for a 3rd Trump term, they can throw it away for anything else they want. Want to go back to only white men who own land voting? It’s the Constitution blocking that. Making treason a crime? The Constitution. Once they break that, we’re hosed.

    • @dil
      link
      136 months ago

      They’re already throwing out the Constitution. Fourteenth amendment says he’s ineligible to be president because of the insurrection.

      • @elephantium
        link
        English
        106 months ago

        That should have been a slam dunk impeachment conviction. That the discussion even gets to the 14th makes me weep for the country I thought I grew up in.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      This isn’t new at all, so if anything ignoring the 22nd is just furthering the current trajectory of decline imo. What happened to our “inalienable right” to privacy, supposedly guaranteed by the 4th amendment, after 9/11 and the ensuing bipartisan surveillance bill known as the Patriot Act?

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      16 months ago

      It would violate the Constitution

      Hardly the first time we’ve done that in this country.