Did you read the article yourself, the most he got in a democratic election was 33% wich isn’t at all excusable, still not voted into power by majority.
So now I have to somehow teach or show you that 33% can be majority?
“The Nazi Party lost 35 seats in the November 1932 election, but remained the Reichstag’s largest party, with 196 seats (33.1%). The Social Democrats (SPD) won 121 seats (20.4%) and the Communists (KPD) won 100 (16.9%).”
Did you read the article yourself, the most he got in a democratic election was 33% wich isn’t at all excusable, still not voted into power by majority.
He was elected. What you consider “excusable” is irrelevant.
33% wins elections and is quite excusable when there’s more than two parties.
So now I have to somehow teach or show you that 33% can be majority?
“The Nazi Party lost 35 seats in the November 1932 election, but remained the Reichstag’s largest party, with 196 seats (33.1%). The Social Democrats (SPD) won 121 seats (20.4%) and the Communists (KPD) won 100 (16.9%).”
Sit down and shut up troll.
So 33% of votes is 50%+1? Interesting how that’s a majority. And 50%+1 was necessary to rule and still is.
Stop drinking the red koolaid troll.
Wtf is koolaid?
Drinking the kool-aid
JFC not everyone uses FPP