@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 7 months agoyay, no dunning kruger for me! hold up, oh nofiles.mastodon.onlineimagemessage-square136fedilinkarrow-up11.19Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imageyay, no dunning kruger for me! hold up, oh nofiles.mastodon.online@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square136fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-27 months agoWhat do you mean when you say that I’m “overestimating”? I’m asking this because I feel like you’re thinking that I’m claiming something I don’t think I’m claiming.
minus-square@trashgirlfriendlink1•7 months agoWell, you claimed that children of parents with higher IQ have more successful children. I pointed out that this is largely due to social factors, to which you replied a non sequitur about how intelligence has a genetic component. From that, a reasonable person would assume that you believe that genetics is a major component of IQ, and not just a small contributing factor.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-27 months ago Well, you claimed that children of parents with higher IQ have more successful children. That wasn’t my first claim. My first claim was that IQ predicts success. I pointed out that this is largely due to social factors, to which you replied a non sequitur about how intelligence has a genetic component. Then I went here because you brought up parents. So not a non-sequitur but a specific reply to your comment. From that, a reasonable person would assume that you believe that genetics is a major component of IQ, and not just a small contributing factor. When I specifically said it’s not clear how big of a factor it is. So no, I don’t think a reasonable person would assume that.
What do you mean when you say that I’m “overestimating”? I’m asking this because I feel like you’re thinking that I’m claiming something I don’t think I’m claiming.
Well, you claimed that children of parents with higher IQ have more successful children.
I pointed out that this is largely due to social factors, to which you replied a non sequitur about how intelligence has a genetic component.
From that, a reasonable person would assume that you believe that genetics is a major component of IQ, and not just a small contributing factor.
That wasn’t my first claim. My first claim was that IQ predicts success.
Then I went here because you brought up parents. So not a non-sequitur but a specific reply to your comment.
When I specifically said it’s not clear how big of a factor it is. So no, I don’t think a reasonable person would assume that.