A Chinese company creates hyper-realistic humanoids that mimic emotions for healthcare and education, raising questions about ethics and job displacement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    297 months ago

    If you want realistic humanoids look at the Japanese sex industry.

    This article is all “China bad” while neglecting to realize Amazon is aiming at replacing workers with humanoid robots too.

    Hypocrites.

    • @CosmoNova
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Humanoid robots are awfully expensive to maintain and a silly idea for factories. The team of robot experts you’d need to run this operation would cost much more in the end. You‘d be better off just building fully automated factories that use conveyor belts and wheeled robots. In other words, this is just Amazon propaganda to discourage unions and keep wages low. Robots are not on the way to replace us but rich fucks have every reason to make us believe so.

      • @Etterra
        link
        English
        57 months ago

        You’re correct, however if you’ve ever worked in a distribution center you’d know that single-operation dumb bots have limited usefulness. There’s plenty of times when the product picker’s task is: go to location, open case, take out product, place safely on pallet/wire rack/belt so that it won’t get wrecked or dropped, scan data into needlessly complicated proprietary software that’s not compatible with anything else, clean up after yourself (out the last guy), repeat.

        There’s a shocking amount of manual labor required in the industry that requires something like a person to do in distribution, just because it’s too complicated and multifaceted for current machines to handle. My example didn’t even cover half of the job.

        • @CosmoNova
          link
          English
          16 months ago

          Oh of course. My point wasn‘t that there‘s already easier ways to replace all workers. It was more about that humanoid robots sure ain‘t it. The upkeep cost and fail rates are way too high to be cost effective and we won‘t see more of them than small test facilities that only exist as a bad proof of concept to pressure employees.