• @JoeKrogan
    link
    English
    305 months ago

    Incredible that we can still receive the signal after all this time over such a vast distance. I wish we made our current devices with such longevity in mind 😉😄

    • @niktemadur
      link
      English
      265 months ago

      Voyager is the Nokia of space probes: practically obsolete, code written in ancient runes almost nobody can still decipher and read… yet still keeps on ticking.

      • @Purplexingg
        link
        English
        115 months ago

        I just don’t get how it doesn’t get destroyed by random space shit. I get space is infinitely empty but it’s also infinitely full too, right…

        • @ace_garp
          link
          English
          55 months ago

          Infinitely empty AFAIK.

          Interstellar space is similar to atoms and the electron cloud, some tiny amount of matter and a whole heap of SFA.

          (Someone get at me with the actual numbers, but I’m leaning toward space being more sparse by percentage than an atom.)

          The main solar system objects were accounted for and closely avoided, now it’s a very roomy area to float through alone.

          • @Purplexingg
            link
            English
            25 months ago

            But aren’t there like a bunch of little rocks from like asteroids and stuff? That’s what I never got even for launches from earth, why isn’t everything up there just getting peppered nonstop from debris. I guess space is really just that empty

            • @Confused_Emus
              link
              English
              15 months ago

              Debris like that will tend to concentrate around a gravitational focus. There’s a lot more of the space rocks and stuff you’re worried about within the inner solar system than towards the edges where there’s little gravity to keep those objects from falling further into the solar system. That’s why JWST had micro meteor impact damage so early after its launch.

      • @NeptuneOrbit
        link
        English
        35 months ago

        Apparently it’s on a 12 foot antenna. That’s crazy. I thought for sure they’d be communicating on a much larger dish.

        I’d wager the data rate is pretty low, to increase the fidelity.

      • @evidences
        link
        English
        35 months ago

        Get a big enough dish and you can do wild shit. Arecibo observatory was able to use radar to map the surface of Venus to like 1km resolution.