PDX

The rentier class (Michael Hudson) just sits back and collects. It’s not hard working and Responders worship the rich as the citizens are subjugated to idolize the Occupying Forces of Responders. But the rich never did care about the proles (Orwell).

  • Lemminary
    link
    95 months ago

    Can anyone explain the “no rent on stolen land” bit? I don’t get it. Who stole it if the landlord sold it off and the renter got kicked out?

    • LightscriptionOPM
      link
      3
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Most treaties with the original owners (American Indians) were broken and ignored.

      Of course, the indigenous did not have the same ideas about “ownership,” preferring open prairies, for example, instead of fences. “We do not own the land, the land owns us.” Why do you possess it? Other causes external to yourself created it and sustain it. It all belongs to Sun-Water. Somehow, owners forget all the externalities and sudden break endless causal chains, contingencies and dependencies, and say they solely deserve it and it belongs exclusively to them.

      Then again, there were Europeans who thought “property is theft” and threw off feudalism. Why should the Lord own our labors and lands, they thought?

      Imagine if you or I turned the tables and had a Manifest Destiny today.

      Ownership is a strange concept. There was a commons when there was a King and Crown. Now there is supposed to be no King but there is no Commons, only Lords with dubious claim gained by trickery and inequity.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      05 months ago

      “no rent on stolen land”

      So… Camping for free on land stolen from natives? 🤔 Or people expect others to let them live in their house for free? 🤔

      • Lemminary
        link
        65 months ago

        I also thought it had something to do with Native American land for a second but it’d be so bizarre.