• @stoly
    link
    56 months ago

    Yes. It is. It’s assumed because that’s how the legal theories at the time it was written went.

    • @blazera
      link
      English
      -56 months ago

      Alright show me where in the constitution it is

      • @stoly
        link
        46 months ago

        It’s clear that you think that it was written in a vacuum without any historical context. That’s not how history works. It’s unclear why you are stuck on this particular hill.

        • @blazera
          link
          English
          -56 months ago

          your whole point is that its in the constitution right?

          Yes. It is.

          • @stoly
            link
            45 months ago

            This is a you thing. If you want to learn more, read the wiki article.

            • @blazera
              link
              English
              -55 months ago

              Oh ive learned plenty. That the constitution has nothing in it to support common law.

              • @stoly
                link
                35 months ago

                Good for you, champ!