Steven Pinker explains the cognitive biases we all suffer from and how they can short-circuit rational thinking and lead us into believing stupid things. Skip to 12:15 to bypass the preamble.

  • streetlightsOP
    link
    English
    1
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You want to learn to learn about psychological concepts in 25 minutes by watching a video? Cool, it won’t ever work but I respect your wishes.

    It’s an interview with an eminent scientist discussing some key ideas. No, you won’t walk away with a comprehensive knowledge of the entire field, the format isn’t designed for that.

    But no smart person would believe just watching a quick video is actually learning anything more advanced then: there’s a place for an Allen key under the disposal

    So documentaries are garbage as well then? Anything using video as a medium? Do you attend lectures in person or do wait for the transcript?

    • Flying Squid
      link
      English
      15 months ago

      As someone who has worked on documentaries, depending on your definition of “garbage,” yes. They are. Because all of them, every single one, is not only edited to show the biased perspective of both the director and the producers, along with the editor themselves, they are also filled with things like added sound-effects, narration that misconstrues what is going on or just adds emotion when emotion is not warranted based on the original footage, taking things out of context to improve the storyline, etc.

      For example, the best David Attenborough nature documentary you can think of is full of artifice. Almost none of the animal sounds in nature documentaries were collected at the same time as the video because they’re usually shooting from quite a distance and either the microphone is too directional, in which case you have to add background noise in post or they don’t have enough of a directional microphone, in which case you have to add the noise you want in post. Occasionally, these days, software is used to isolate certain noises. That, again, is artifice.

      So no, you cannot trust anything you see in a documentary. Ever. The only truths you should ever trust in a film of any sort is the truths you learn about yourself from watching it. Anything else could be a lie.

      • @Blue_Morpho
        link
        English
        45 months ago

        Almost none of the animal sounds in nature documentaries were collected at the same time as the video because they’re usually shooting from quite a distance and either the microphone is too directional.

        That doesn’t make it garbage.

        every single one, is not only edited to show the biased perspective of both the director and the producers, along with the editor themselves

        With that restriction, all education is garbage. Professors have bias, even in hard sciences.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          English
          15 months ago

          depending on your definition of “garbage,"

          Please read more carefully.

          • @Blue_Morpho
            link
            English
            4
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            My claim is that making the animal sounds clearer so that there is no confusion for the listener is not garbage under any definition.

            Replacing the original with a better representation is exactly what you want for education.

            Am I learning the sound of a finch or a cardinal? How can I learn if both are singing at the same time because that’s what actually happened in the real life filming?

            • Flying Squid
              link
              English
              25 months ago

              My claim is that making the animal sounds clearer so that there is no confusion for the listener is not garbage under any definition.

              And if that were the only thing I said, you’d have a point.

              It was far from the only thing I said.

              In fact, you’re even misrepresenting that part of what I said. I said that occasionally software is used to clarify audio. Far more often, it’s just added in post from a sound effect library or foley artist. It may not even be a noise that animal ever makes.

              • @Blue_Morpho
                link
                English
                35 months ago

                Far more often, it’s just added in post from a sound effect library or foley artist. It may not even be a noise that animal ever makes.

                I didn’t claim it was only cleaning the audio. It was my intention that an artificial substitution can the best thing to do for education.

                Your original post didn’t mention that the wrong sounds are used. That’s completely different.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  English
                  05 months ago

                  My post did mention other things that you decided not to bring up- namely the bias of the production team and the tone of the narrator.

                  I mentioned those first specifically because they were the most important.

                  I could point out that music also creates an artificial mood which might not reflect the reality of what was shot.

                  • @Blue_Morpho
                    link
                    English
                    25 months ago

                    bias of the production team and the tone of the narrator.

                    Which I already addressed by claiming professors have bias even in hard sciences.

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Hold still and I’ll go make a YouTube video for you.

      I don’t know why I thought you were going to get anything out of the written word.

      Just wait right there and I’ll scream some buzzwords into a microphone for you, and tell you that you’re smarter than everyone. Because you may be able to remember some of those buzzwords, but not what they actually mean.

      Disruption! Synergy! The Singularity!

      Now hold still for 7 minutes of ads!