@PugJesus to RPGMemes @ttrpg.networkEnglish • 5 months agoA little fear is goodimagemessage-square49arrow-up1576arrow-down136
arrow-up1540arrow-down1imageA little fear is good@PugJesus to RPGMemes @ttrpg.networkEnglish • 5 months agomessage-square49
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink22•5 months agoCongrats, you’ve just discovered internet memes.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink15•5 months agoBut this one make more sense because Tanith keeps her word and goes from “would” to “did”
minus-squareÐ Greıt Þu̇mpkinlinkfedilink5•5 months agoDoes that count if it was before she had a hongri snek boi she was fattening up to have as a pre-made sausage?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•5 months agoSame. Yet another internet comic just blatantly stealing from another one.
minus-squareFushuan [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish33•5 months agoit’s a reference to elden ring. That’s Tanith and Rickard/the serpent.
minus-square@Iheartcheeselink12•5 months agoAnd the original comic was about A biblically accurate angel. They just ripped it off. I posted it elsewhere in this thread.
minus-square@samus12345linkEnglish17•5 months agoI’d say it’s more of a parody/homage, although since the original isn’t well-known it needs to be presented along with this one.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•5 months ago the original isn’t well known This comic got called out immediately by multiple people
minus-square@samus12345linkEnglish6•5 months agoBut it was called a “rip-off” when it was clearly parodying the original.
minus-square@ZorquelinkEnglish1•5 months agoThat doesn’t mean the original isn’t well know, just that people often take the worst possible angle.
minus-square@ThatWeirdGuy1001link8•5 months agoIdk if either of you are aware of this but sometimes, two different people, who have never interacted in any way, can come up with the same idea. In a world with 8 billion people it’s hard to have an original thought and even harder to put that thought out before someone else does.
minus-square@Iheartcheeselink46•edit-25 months ago It’s word for word the same comic and the same angles and everything. Stop trying to be a smart-ass if you don’t know what you’re talking about.
minus-square@samus12345linkEnglish11•5 months agoIs this the original? Having the “monster” be an angel and labeling the person “monster fucker” makes it actually make sense to me.
minus-square@samus12345linkEnglish6•5 months agoA rip-off is something that is copying something else while pretending to be original. This is parodying the original.
minus-squareI Cast Fistlinkfedilink14•edit-25 months agoIn the OP’s comic, it certainly takes longer to figure “would what?” The original above with the angel has “monster fucker” on the person, so it’s a bit easier to deduce, “would fuck”
minus-squareI Cast Fistlinkfedilink1•3 months agoThe dragon (and the angel) doesn’t want to be seen as someone that a silly human would want to fuck, so it’s “you’re supposed to be afraid enough of me that you won’t want to have sex with me”
minus-square@Iheartcheeselink2•5 months agoKind of a meme to say that when you are looking at someone you would fuck
minus-square@ceenotelink3•5 months agoHe’s setting expectations appropriately with that shirt, what more do you want?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•5 months agoThat’s not what happens when people use the same word bubbles or images and change them.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzechlinkfedilink2•5 months agoMeta is self-reference, not just any reference
Ive seen this exact joke with another monster
Congrats, you’ve just discovered internet memes.
But this one make more sense because Tanith keeps her word and goes from “would” to “did”
Does that count if it was before she had a hongri snek boi she was fattening up to have as a pre-made sausage?
deleted by creator
Same. Yet another internet comic just blatantly stealing from another one.
it’s a reference to elden ring. That’s Tanith and Rickard/the serpent.
And the original comic was about A biblically accurate angel. They just ripped it off. I posted it elsewhere in this thread.
I’d say it’s more of a parody/homage, although since the original isn’t well-known it needs to be presented along with this one.
This comic got called out immediately by multiple people
But it was called a “rip-off” when it was clearly parodying the original.
That doesn’t mean the original isn’t well know, just that people often take the worst possible angle.
No you haven’t…
Idk if either of you are aware of this but sometimes, two different people, who have never interacted in any way, can come up with the same idea.
In a world with 8 billion people it’s hard to have an original thought and even harder to put that thought out before someone else does.
It’s word for word the same comic and the same angles and everything. Stop trying to be a smart-ass if you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Is this the original? Having the “monster” be an angel and labeling the person “monster fucker” makes it actually make sense to me.
Yep. This comic even has its own know your meme page
Harsh to call this a “rip-off”, then.
… because it’s obviously ripping it off?
A rip-off is something that is copying something else while pretending to be original. This is parodying the original.
I still don’t get the ,would".
In the OP’s comic, it certainly takes longer to figure “would what?”
The original above with the angel has “monster fucker” on the person, so it’s a bit easier to deduce, “would fuck”
Oh. Yeah. But why afraid?
The dragon (and the angel) doesn’t want to be seen as someone that a silly human would want to fuck, so it’s “you’re supposed to be afraid enough of me that you won’t want to have sex with me”
Would have sex
Kind of a meme to say that when you are looking at someone you would fuck
He’s setting expectations appropriately with that shirt, what more do you want?
That’s not what happens when people use the same word bubbles or images and change them.
Meta
Meta is self-reference, not just any reference