Actor is due to go to trial over death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, who was killed on set of Rust

Fewer than three weeks before actor Alec Baldwin is due to go on trial in Santa Fe, New Mexico, prosecutors have said that he “engaged in horseplay with the revolver”, including firing a blank round at a crew member on the set of Rust before the tragic accident occurred.

Baldwin is facing involuntary manslaughter charges in the 2021 shooting death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

In new court documents, prosecutors said they plan to bring new evidence to support their case that the 66-year-old actor and producer was reckless with firearms while filming on the set and displayed “erratic and aggressive behavior during the filming” that created potential safety concerns.

Prosecutors in the case, which is due to go to trial on 10 July, have previously alleged that to watch Baldwin’s conduct on the set of Rust “is to witness a man who has absolutely no control of his own emotions and absolutely no concern for how his conduct affects those around him”.

In the latest filing, special prosecutors Kari Morrissey and Erlinda Johnson allege that Baldwin pointed his gun and fired “a blank round at a crew member while using that crew member as a line of site as his perceived target”.

  • @ZoopZeZoop
    42•6 months ago

    The only reason to do it is verisimilitude, and that’s not compelling because a fake is easy enough to acquire/create.

    • @[email protected]
      57•6 months ago

      In 2024 having a real firearm on set is unconscionable. Especially without a proper armorist. This was not only avoidable, but the situation shouldn’t have even presented itself.

    • @[email protected]
      6•6 months ago

      It also only matters at all because of people banging on about “this movie was set in 1935, but the down-bent charging handle on gun X wasn’t introduced until 1941”. Which will still happen, anyway, and it’s not a good enough reason to have real firearms on set.

    • @[email protected]English
      2•6 months ago

      Isn’t literally everything in film and TV intended to look real, or at least look like it exists in that universe?

      • @ZoopZeZoop
        0•6 months ago

        Sure, but the difference between a real gun and a fake gun is not that great.

        Also, they often shoot 30 times without reloading from guns with a much lesser capacity. Their interest in realism is often so-so.

          • @ZoopZeZoop
            2•6 months ago

            My original point was that the difference in how real it looks is not so great that it is outweighed by dangers of having a functional gun.

            My later point was that they can’t be all that concerned with being realistic if they are shooting 30 times from a gun with a 10 round magazine without reloading.

            • @[email protected]
              1•6 months ago

              Ironically, I think there is a link there. I am more likely to relax my disbelief if things look real. Once I have immersed myself into a situation I believe ( because it seems real ), I am less likely to pay attention to things like shot count.

              It is the same as having heros that struggle with situations early on and then later are effortlessly capable of so much more. I already believed them so now they can take advantage of that.