• Victoria Antoinette
    link
    13 months ago

    I was explaining why two people can be responsible for the same thing without ruining free will.

    but its so disanalogous to how our food systems work that it’s irrelevant.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      It’s not irrelevant because it has nothing to do with food systems. You said that if you were responsible for a dead animal then an abattoir worker has no free will. I was exclusively explaining the concept of shared responsibility, wherein two parties can be responsible for something while maintaining free will.

      • Victoria Antoinette
        link
        13 months ago

        but because of how disanalogous your explanation is to the facts on the ground, your explanation is moot. you might as well have explained the housing market. one has nothing to do with the other.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          What are you even on about? You tried to deny shared responsibility, I explained the concept. Shared responsibility applies to this discussion. It’s a metaphor, if I used the housing market to explain the concept it would have been just as valid and applicable.