• @just_another_person
    link
    English
    1296 months ago

    Is this a question?

    We haven’t even come close to exhausting 64-bit addresses yet. If you think the bit number makes things faster, it’s technically the opposite.

    • jwr1OP
      link
      fedilink
      936 months ago

      It’s a link to an article I found interesting. It basically details why we’re still using 64-bit CPUs, just as you mentioned.

      • fmstrat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        196 months ago

        Comment OP must never learn anything new. Good find.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      676 months ago

      We don’t even have true 64-bit addressing yet. x86-64 uses only 48 bits of a 64 bit address and 64-bit ARM can use anything between 40 and 52 depending on the specific configuration.

        • @MrQuallzin
          link
          English
          616 months ago

          I think they were just adding to the conversation

          • @AlphaAutist
            link
            English
            336 months ago

            I actually didn’t know that about addressing before your comment and so I found it very interesting, thanks

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              Some applications use those unused bits to add tags to pointers but it’s important to mask those out before attempting to dereference the address. I’m not sure about ARM but x86-64 requires bits 49-63 to be copies of bit 48 (kinda like sign-extension), ironically to ensure that no one is using those bits to store extra data.

        • @b34k
          link
          English
          56 months ago

          Removed by mod

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      356 months ago

      Yeah, 64 bit handles almost all use cases we have. Sometimes we want double the precision (a double) or length (a long), but we can do that without being 128-bit. It’s harder to do half. Sure, it’d be slightly faster for some things, but it’s not significant.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        226 months ago

        And you can get 128-bit data to the CPU, so those things can be fast if we need them to be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          216 months ago

          And we have wide instructions that can process this data, such as for multimedia applications.

          Addressing and memory size has been the historic motivator for wider registers, but it’s probably not going to be in my lifetime that I see the need for 128.

      • Justin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 months ago

        There’s plenty of instructions for processing integers and fp numbers from 8 bits to 512 bits with a single instruction and register. There’s been a lot of work in packed math instructions for neural network inference.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      346 months ago

      Is this a question?

      For the people who don’t know the answer? Yes.

      Not everything you see is intended for your consumption. Let people enjoy learning things.

      • @Cocodapuf
        link
        English
        16
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I totally agree. I know a teacher who who likes to say:

        “I believe there really is no such thing as a dumb question. As long as it’s an honest question (not rhetorical or sarcastic), then it’s a genuine request for more information. So even if it’s coming from a place of extreme ignorance, asking a question is an attempt to learn something, and the effort should be applauded.”