• @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
    link
    English
    56 months ago

    This whole freakout over one bad debate (that had lousy ratings) in effing June is more embarrassing than productive. Maybe everyone should calm the fuck down and wait for enough high quality poll data to see if it even caused a shift in the race. For all we know, it changed zero minds or people were turned off by Trump’s angrier, dumber rambling old man answers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      56 months ago

      One bad debate is one thing but this was maybe the worst debate performance in history. And Biden’s polling was already quite bad prior to this. These polls show essentially no advantage in sticking with Biden, which is highly unusual for an incumbent. It’s likely to only be worse after the new information gets factored in.

      That said, you’re right that we likely need all of the information from new polling to decide on the correct path. But if democrats are smart they are at a minimum setting up an alternative candidate at this point.

      • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
        link
        English
        26 months ago

        Agreed. I’m not saying Biden should or shouldn’t drop out. I’m saying we’ll know more in a few days and everyone should calm down and also consider the downside risks. Even beyond basic horse race polling, we don’t know how voters would react to a replacement candidate instead of “generic Democrat.” Maybe someone like Whitmer solidifies Michigan but is unpopular with Georgia or Arizona voters for some reason. I have no idea at this point.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          Unfortunately, a candidate dropping out like this is almost unheard of, so the downsides are pretty uncertain. Personally I think people are a little too worried about this but there certainly is some risk that what seems like a good candidate under casual examination ends up having some fatal flaw or hidden scandal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          I haven’t seen that one but from what I’ve read, polling showed a similar level of disparity in performance—with about two thirds of viewers giving the edge to Trump and Reagan respectively. Also, the Reagan campaign had access to Carter’s debate prep notes so it was a bit of a unique circumstance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      Polls dont matter I thought. Or am I only supposed to say that when it shows Biden losing the general?

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      36 months ago

      I mean, that’s all pro-Israel moderates…

      • growsomethinggood ()
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        Yeah, I’m suspicious that at least Warren isn’t on that list given her performance in the last primary was higher than several of the folks there. Bernie could be more polarizing (and is also quite old, if that’s the problem) but obviously I’d be interested in his statistics as well.

        • @givesomefucks
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah, be cautious of anyone that sources polls with screenshots and not links.

          I looked into Data for Progress, and it seems like they sold out last election.

          https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/12/us/politics/data-for-progress-democrats.html

          Party establishment started favoring them because they were good at coming up with polls that led to donations. So they’ve moved away from pushing for progress, and now push polls that defend the establishment.

          A few years ago the founder was forced out of the company because it came to light he was betting on elections and using the company to try and effect the races so he’d win his bets…

          And trying to recruit his employees for a straw donor scheme…

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_McElwee#Data_for_Progress

          So them putting out a shady poll like this, is actually an improvement for the company over what they were doing in 2022…

          • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
            link
            English
            -16 months ago

            My initial post was saying to wait for high quality polling data and stop having panic attacks over one debate. The downside risk to Biden dropping out is real and everyone is acting like it’ll be a simple situation where everyone unites around their preferred candidate.

            I didn’t vote for Biden in any primary but I’m not convinced a convention where they nominate (for instance) Harris, Newsom, or Whitmer would be anything but chaos that angered at least some constituencies and led to more Republicans winning up and down the ballot. Everyone is assuming things at this point and I’m saying “Wait to see if this even moves the polls.”

            • @givesomefucks
              link
              English
              16 months ago

              high quality polling data

              What does that have to do with Data for Progress?

              Even before they sold out, the whole point was cheap and fast, not high quality…

              • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
                link
                English
                -16 months ago

                I meant that’s all we have at the moment so be patient and give it a week. I know Data for Progress is a bit of a mess. The last CEO got run off for essentially insider trading on prediction markets.

      • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
        link
        English
        16 months ago

        I have bad news about who a convention of Biden loyalists will nominate regardless of what horrors Israel does. Or a committee of wise party elders (which doesn’t exist), for that matter. The time to challenge Biden was before he won every primary with like 80% of the vote.

        There’s just not a realistic way that I can see where the convention nominates a progressive option. Even just replacing Biden with someone younger and the exact same policies would be nearly impossible.

          • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
            link
            English
            -16 months ago

            I responded to another post but I don’t think we have high quality post-debate data yet. Most pollsters are affiliated with one party. That’s who pays them for internal polls and where they make their money. The few independent, non-profit poll organizations haven’t released anything I’ve seen. (And there’s like 6 news organizations left that can afford to conduct polls.)

            Either way, though, you’re better off with a poll average than any one poll. We’re a few days away from knowing how likely voters responded to the debate.