Conservatives joke that progressives just blow with the wind from one controversy to the next. But I can’t help but notice the anti-Biden “left” shifted hard from Genocide Joe to Bad debate Performance without skipping a beat or looking back.

Almost like the people stoking these fires don’t really care about left issues at all.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    536 months ago

    Accelerationism is a position that is literally only possible to hold from a position of privilege.

    I’m sure crashing through the decline into fascism looks like a great idea when you know you’re high enough on the kill list to avoid the actual consequences of fascism happening.

    The white left never saw us as allies, only as fodder.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      116 months ago

      I’m not sure of the term for this, but I’ll call it “billionaire blindness”. Not blindness to billionaires but a blindness that affects billionaires. And it works like this: because they overestimate their own abilities – their ego cannot handle the large part that luck played in their success – they correspondingly underestimate the abilities of their lackeys.

      In this particular context, they vastly underestimate their political pawns. They fail to realize that once Trump and Taylor-Green and cohorts gain dictatorial powers, then those former lackeys will become the masters. To quote Jello Biafra, “In the real fourth reich you’ll be the first to go.” I don’t know what we’ll call it tho. “Night of Long Knives” is too poetic.

    • @Passerby6497
      link
      English
      76 months ago

      Accelerationism is a position that is literally only possible to hold from a position of privilege.

      And boy do they get butthurt when you tell them that they’re privileged.

      I got one person really indignant with me when I called them privileged because they were pushing accelerationist bullshit about Palestinians being genocides because they didn’t have to deal with the results of their rhetoric.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        I’ve seen the same in someone I know personally. He’s a pacifist, and being against funding Ukraine is at least consistent with that, if completely shortsighted and demonstrating how pacifism is an end goal, not praxis that we can do right now. He’s also smart enough to realize what a losing argument that is and focuses on Palestine instead.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        86 months ago

        White self proclaimed socialists and leftists who will theory their way all around why it’s everyone else’s job to praxis in even the bare minimum ways, and who see queer folks and PoC effectively as pawns to throw into the meat grinder of fascism until it eventually chews its teeth out.

        See also, when the french communists outed immigrant resistance leaders to the retreating Nazis to take all the credit with the dead unable to correct the record for themselves.

        • @Mobilityfuture
          link
          56 months ago

          I understand your definition and can relate to this being a (privileged) element of left discourse. That being said I question if your attribution of this definition to a broader category of your own making… “the white left” is helpful to anyone. If you feel it is keep throwing it around I guess

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        “Progressives” with enough privilege that they think that if it comes down to it, they can always bend the knee to avoid the wall.

        These people tend to be rabidly accelerationist, cause it’s not their lives and livelihoods on the line.

        This line of thinking allows you to be an ideological purist and denounce any incrementalism or harm reduction as antithetical to the cause, stirring up infighting.

        It also happens to be an excellent strategy outlined in the CIA’s saboteur handbook. (Literally, Google it, download the PDF from CIA.gov)

            • Victoria Antoinette
              link
              16 months ago

              harm reduction is recognizing the bad thing is going to happen, and helping people mitigate the consequences. it has a specific meaning, and voting is not harm reduction.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The bad thing that will happen is Project 2025. We can mitigate that by voting for candidates that want nothing to do with Project 2025.

                • Victoria Antoinette
                  link
                  16 months ago

                  your falling for (or perpetrating) an informal fallacy called “equivocation”. voting is not harm reduction.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -26 months ago

      Literally? As in figuratively? Or are you one of those “a vote for anyone other than Biden is literally a vote for Trump” people?