Worth noting that these transcripts detail Trump forcing 12 year olds to act out lesbian sex while he watched, then give him sloppy head. And apparently when the BJ was kinda toothy (cuz, ya know, they’re 12,) he got angry and physical.
But sure, let’s elect him as king of the United States.
Shouldn’t it be on them to prove it is a “fabrication”?
Like if I made the claim that you enjoy breaking spaghetti in half when you make any (and no-one is watching), how would you ever possibly prove that it’s not true?
Worth noting that these transcripts detail Trump forcing 12 year olds to act out lesbian sex while he watched, then give him sloppy head. And apparently when the BJ was kinda toothy (cuz, ya know, they’re 12,) he got angry and physical.
But sure, let’s elect him as king of the United States.
Source? Idk if joking bc this is the world we live in now
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.646485.1.0.pdf
That is completely fucked up. Imagine wanting this guy to be the President.
Imagine being the victims and seeing him become president and all the people that support him. Sounds like hell
Was this case dismissed? Still ongoing? How is there not more on this? This would be prison for anyone else no question.
Could you quote from the document tge specific passage. Include page and paragrapj. None of these links work here.
What the fuck
The former and possibly future president of the USA, criticising the quality of sex work from the literal child he’s raping.
/r/conservative claim this testimony was retired and it was a fabrication. Can that be debunked ?
Shouldn’t it be on them to prove it is a “fabrication”?
Like if I made the claim that you enjoy breaking spaghetti in half when you make any (and no-one is watching), how would you ever possibly prove that it’s not true?
Pages 2 and 3 of the PDF in the link.
That shit is straight out of the legal document.
No, you’re doing it wrong. When someone requests a source, it’s helpful to include a link in your response.