• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      226 months ago

      This is a great point, but it probably doesn’t do the job as well as more modern alternatives.

      1. Easy to lose, possible data leak concerns.
      2. Easy to retain data that should have been deleted.
      3. Easy to lose data if a disk gets lost or damaged.
      4. Likely wastes time when trying to track down the disk you need to getting someone to transfer it.
      5. Lack of access logs and auditing capabilities.
      6. Easy way for viruses to spread.

      Modern IT managed file servers solve a lot of real problems when well-managed.

      • tiredofsametab
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        All of those are true of even smaller USB drives (which has been a problem here).

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      On the other hand, if you use an old technology that isn’t being mass produced anymore, it can reach a point where it will become a big liability for a mission-critical piece of equipment.

      • @Mpatch
        link
        English
        56 months ago

        Yah this is bad I run a cnc plasma table, big table 10 feet x 20 feet. It uses floppy disks. Pain in the ass to find a new drive and pain in the ass to find new disks because constant write re write emf and metal dust kills them. But despite that it’s still cheaper and easier than a $15k retro fit to a more modern controler.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        I think there was something about the US government having to finally get rid of vacuum tubes because the only suppliers were in Russia.

    • tiredofsametab
      link
      fedilink
      76 months ago

      The most practical reasons are that both the drives and media are getting harder to find.