• @kitnaht
    link
    -30
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Problem with “walkable” is it means you’ve gotta cram 5 million tens of thousands of people into a couple of square miles; and I hate seeing people – I love seeing cars.

    • @_stranger_
      link
      11
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If you want the opposite of walkable, move to Phoenix, AZ.

      • @kitnaht
        link
        -13
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If I want the opposite of walkable, why would I move into such a population dense area? If I wanted the opposite of walkable, I’d move to the middle of nowhere, with nothing around; not one of the most population dense cities in America…

        Phoenix is literally the 5th most populated city in the USA

        • mozingo
          link
          English
          73 months ago

          Okay, so you’re not complaining about the walkable part, you’re complaining about the city part.

          • @_stranger_
            link
            4
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Even then, it’s easier to be a recluse in a city where you can get everything delivered and never leave your home.

            If they move out to the middle of nowhere, they’ll never see a car again, and will have no where to go anyway, so what’s the point if they have to drive an hour to get groceries where there will definitely be people.