• @RapidcreekOP
    link
    385 months ago

    U.S. Marshal on duty did not shoot to kill. FAFO

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      235 months ago

      They fired four shots at his mouth…. Sounds like shoot to kill, but because the perpetrator was disabled they didn’t continue firing.

      • @Jumpingspiderman
        link
        185 months ago

        Which is the way it should be done. Now mr Flowers is experiencing the Find Out part.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          Hey turns out it’s possible to teach law enforcement not to pull their firearm unless they intend to shoot to kill and that you should stop shooting when there is no longer a present threat. Who woulda thunk it?

    • @michaelmrose
      link
      English
      15 months ago

      Everyone even moderately competent shoots to kill. They fire most commonly at the torso until the individual is no longer a threat. Turns out that putting several bullets into someone’s body commonly kills them. Only in TV shows do people shoot people in non-vital areas to disable them and only in TV shows does shooting people in the foot or shoulder not just kill people same as shooting them anywhere else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        95 months ago

        Small correction: they shoot with the intention of stopping the threat, not with the intention to kill. Otherwise, you’re completely correct

        -former LEO and current firearms instructor

        • @michaelmrose
          link
          English
          15 months ago

          That is what I meant but stated more clearly thank you.