• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1905 months ago

    If it worked for most shit and escalated to a human when it actually needed to, reliably, I’d be fine with it.

    I don’t believe there’s a realistic chance that there’s a lot of overlap between the people willing to invest to actually do it properly and the people paying for AI instead of people though.

    • @ArbiterXero
      link
      English
      955 months ago

      The problem is the same as with the telephone answering trees.

      If they’re used to help you get where you’re going, then they’re great. But that’s not the best financially motivated decision. Solving your problem costs the companies money. Pissing you off and convincing you that your problem shouldn’t be fixed saves money on support.

      So making you go round in circles is the machine doing EXACTLY what they want it to do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        385 months ago

        That’s an additional problem.

        But the bigger problem is that it’s not actually possible to do a good job without genuine meaningful investment in building out the tooling properly.

        • @ArbiterXero
          link
          English
          175 months ago

          That’s just it…… they are building it out properly, their goal is just not what you think it is.

    • @MeatsOfRage
      link
      English
      28
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I get one of those meal kit delivery services. Every few weeks I’ll go to their AI customer support and ask for cancellation and it’ll give me discounts on upcoming orders. I keep the service at about 40% off at all times. Also when there’s a problem with the order the chat bot just tosses me a discount. Cases like this are perfect for AI customer service.

      Edit

      Wow this blew up in a weird way. Just to be clear on a few points:

      With the discount I pay $87 Canadian which is $76 untaxed or about $55usd. I also pay for this service using gift cards from Costco that are 20% off ($100 for $80) bringing that $55 weekly cost down to about $44. For 6 different dinners for me and my wife delivered to my front door every Monday. With crazy grocery prices where I live I cannot come close to beating that without giving up something. I won’t eat the same thing every night (Sunday meal prep bros, don’t at me), I don’t want to expend the mental energy gathering recipes and ingredients but I do enjoy cooking a lot. It’s something at the end of the day I can do with my hands free of screens. At regular price this was worth it to me, at 40% off it’s actually saving me money. If they’re still making money shipping this big box off food to me on a weekly basis, then good for them, we’re both coming out on top.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        235 months ago

        Except they’re selling you the kit at waaaay over cost in the first place, so they’re still making money off of you. I promise you they are aware of the “glitch”, and are not ignoring it out of the kindness of their hearts.

        (not criticising you for using the service, if it works for you go for it and get those discounts, but don’t let them manipulate you in to thinking you’ve got one over on them, they 100% account for this kind of thing and are still making money)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 months ago

          If X number of people pay full price and only Y number people go through the hoops of getting a discount the company comes out ahead!

          • @TeddE
            link
            English
            155 months ago

            It’s worse then that. They’re actively profiting from that discount rate, meaning they’re ludicrously profiting from everyone who doesn’t spend half their life getting discount codes (the cost of convenience)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              45 months ago

              I mean most products you’d sell you’re hopefully making at least 40% profit margin so everyone would still be making money. They’re just banking on you sticking around and not canceling. lots of money > some money > no money

            • @MeatsOfRage
              link
              English
              -25 months ago

              How is 2 minutes with a chat bot half of someone’s life?

              • dactylotheca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                We humans sometimes use a rhetorical device called “hyperbole” where we use exaggeration to emphasize our point, and it’s usually not meant to be taken literally. Welcome to the planet, hope you enjoy your stay.

                • @MeatsOfRage
                  link
                  English
                  -35 months ago

                  Yes but the point you’re trying to get across is this is a huge amount of effort when it’s really trivial.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    25 months ago

                    While I wish you a happy and healthy life, I do hope you get to experience the joys of the US Healthcare system some day to broaden your limited horizons.

                    Guess I’ll die.

        • @MeatsOfRage
          link
          English
          15 months ago

          Yea but it works out to $87 (Canadian) for 6 different nights of meals for 2 people. Delivered to my door. I suspect their angle is using this to just keep you from churning at a loss in hopes of just keeping you around in case you go back to paying regular price. The amount of meat, vegetables and dairy in the box along with cost of shipping and paying people to assemble this order, the cost has to be damn near $87 if not a little over.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Like I said, I don’t criticise anyone for using the service, and the more affordable it is, the better, but trust that they are definitely not working at a loss, in the same way supermarkets, that would probably still charge less for the same items, do - by making you believe they’re selling to you at just about what it costs them to get by, when they are selling it to you for significantly more.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        125 months ago

        And it’s quite possible that it’s cheaper for them to give those discounts since they’re not employing as many humans. Humans are expensive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          135 months ago

          It’s more likely that the food is so cheap that the company still makes money at 40% off. Like how mattresses are always discounted 30% to 70% .

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            75 months ago

            They certainly do, but they won’t give up that extra margin if they don’t have to. If customers hate dealing with the AI service, it may be cheaper to compensate them with more discounts than put humans back on the phone.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Thanks for the massive bill mom and dad.

          They got their serotonin and I got exploitation every waking moment of my life.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        Dropping pricing down to a reasonable amount by making you jump through hoops instead of pricing it fairly in the first place?

        That is like praising someone for stabbing you instead of shooting you.

        • @MeatsOfRage
          link
          English
          75 months ago

          I mean, I’m choosing to use this service. If it felt unfair I’d just buy the groceries myself. They’re not a charity, you’re getting a premium service and there are costs associated with this. I don’t think it’s priced unfairly to begin with, it falls somewhere between buying your own groceries and getting takeout. The value is saving me time figuring out recipes, gathering the ingredients and getting a different meal every night, this is the value you pay for. I don’t know why people expect these companies to just give this service away.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 months ago

            I don’t know why people expect these companies to just give this service away.

            Idk if you’ve noticed but there seem to be a lot of people on Lemmy who are opposed to the theory underlying the profit motive. If your product or service is priced above cost then it is automatically bad. 🤷‍♂️

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        English
        35 months ago

        Smart.

        Those of you getting Netflix, Peacock, NFL or other TV subs, note that the cancel button will likely give you long-term discounts too.

        USE THEM

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      The answer is always, the service will sick until you leave for another company.

      Then you’ll find out sucks just as much there, cause you have to buy from someone

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      In my experience the AI assistant is just trained on the information available on the firm’s website.

      In 2024 I never just call a company expecting to be able to be assisted by a person. It’s always quicker and easier to figure out how to interact with said company online. The only times you call are when it’s not possible to resolve your query by interacting with them online.

      That being the case, the entire purpose of the AI in this case is just to make it less convenient to call them. “Have you tried to resolve your issue online? Are you really sure about that? Maybe I could paraphrase this blog post from our website written by an intern 12 years ago.”

      • @kalleboo
        link
        English
        25 months ago

        90% of people calling support lines are due to questions that are in the top 10 ten on the FAQ. They’re just the type of people who don’t like reading and just want a social answer. The same kind of people who get told “just do a search, this is asked weekly” on Reddit.

        If there was a way to direct the “I just need a FAQ that I don’t need to read myself” people to an LLM and the “something is actually broken I need real help” to people, that would be ideal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      If it worked for most shit and escalated to a human when it actually needed to, reliably, I’d be fine with it.

      If you think that’s how it will be implemented, I have some beans I’d like to sell you.