• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    152 months ago

    As Jon Stewart and many others have already pointed out -Two of our closest allies just recently managed to announce and host national elections in a matter of weeks. It’s nothing short of absurd that we allegedly can’t even field a new candidate for a single party in the course of four months.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      I wish our system was theirs.

      But historically, in the US, the candidate with the biggest war chest wins the election.

      Biden has considerably more than Trump. Inertia alone is almost certain to guarantee that Trump loses with Biden on the ticket. That being said, one of the only times this wasn’t true meant Trump became president.

      • @kromem
        link
        English
        02 months ago

        So you’re saying that Hillary Clinton losing to Trump was because she didn’t have as large of a war chest?

        Or was that not part of history?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          From what I read, she did have the bigger war chest. I am sorry if I was unclear. I was stating that Donald Trump is a rare candidate who has won without the larger funding base.

          • @kromem
            link
            English
            02 months ago

            Precisely.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              You have one candidate who beat the odds and won with less money. He will win with more money.

              Kamala is the only path forward.

          • @kromem
            link
            English
            0
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            “Nooo, you can’t point to the very relevant counterpoint to what’s being claimed. That’s not fair.”