The poll, which was conducted from July 7 to July 9, found that 73 percent of Democratic voters “somewhat” or “strongly” approve of Harris as Biden’s replacement. In an earlier iteration of the same survey, conducted from July 3 to July 6, a 66 percent majority of Democrats approved of Harris as a replacement.

  • @TokenBoomer
    link
    12
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So it won’t matter if she replaces him, right? I mean, if it doesn’t matter who the candidate is with polling, then changing the candidate shouldn’t matter, right? Like, why are we keeping Biden if it doesn’t matter who the candidate is? Theoretically, if it doesn’t make a difference who the nominee is, and it won’t change anything, then changing the nominee shouldn’t be a problem, right?

    • @Rapidcreek
      link
      02 months ago

      It more has to with polls. If the electorate is more or less set, then the numbers game turns into a get out the vote campaign. There is no reason to think that the candidate will have an affect on that, unless of course if you’ve already voted for them once

      • @TokenBoomer
        link
        52 months ago

        If polling is static for all potential candidates, then what harm can come from changing them? Why fight so hard for a candidate that you know is going to lose, unless you want that candidate to lose? 🤨

        • @Rapidcreek
          link
          12 months ago

          First of all - more or less static

          Second ‐ it stops being who do you want as President, and who you’ll drag your ass to the polls for.

          Current polls don’t answer that

          • @TokenBoomer
            link
            32 months ago

            Then you should have no problem changing the candidate, right? Right?

            • @Rapidcreek
              link
              02 months ago

              Unless there is a motivating factor of already voting for Biden which weakens GOTV…

    • @Carrolade
      link
      English
      -12 months ago

      We aren’t “keeping” Biden, the primary process was when other people could run against him and we got to pick. Now that he has secured the nomination, only one person on Earth decides if Biden continues to run or not–Biden himself.

      Unless he gets impeached and removed from office or something, which is not very likely.

      Hell, he even gets immunity for all sorts of possible crimes now, thanks to the Supreme Court.

        • @Carrolade
          link
          English
          -12 months ago

          No, all they can do is stop donating. They cannot hold a gun to his head and control his actions.

          • @TokenBoomer
            link
            22 months ago

            That’s why you’re seeing a struggle within the party. It’s over, it’s been over, Biden just hasn’t accepted it yet.

            • @Carrolade
              link
              English
              02 months ago

              Maybe, I don’t know. I was just shooting down that standard DNC conspiracy theory nonsense. “Donors deciding” is just a step away from “Jews run the world”, with the George Soros conspiracy theories being the step in the middle.

              Common sense dictates that money does not grant you mind control powers, however, just sway.

                • @Carrolade
                  link
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  I am not saying there is not a shitload of money in politics, it is true there is a ton of corporate money in our politics.

                  However, does the money grant control? Yes or no?

                  If I give you one billion dollars, you personally, could I then force you to do something you did not want to do? Murder a loved one perhaps? Or resign a presidency you’ve probably wanted your whole life?

                  Think about specifics, not vague bullshit. Money does not grant control, people retain their free will. It can only help convince. Lobby. Sway. Influence. Not control.

                  That’s the line between reality and conspiracy theory bullshit.

                  • @TokenBoomer
                    link
                    1
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Money doesn’t give you control over people, it influences decisions.

                    Why do we pay rent or mortgage? Do the landlords or banks control us, or influence us to pay? Why do cult leaders exists if adherents have “free will?” Are they controlled or manipulated?

                    If money didn’t influence and control politics, we would have gun regulations, healthcare, and climate reform.

                    It’s not a conspiracy theory.

              • @bostonbananarama
                link
                12 months ago

                This is an incredibly bad position. Saying that donors decide is nothing like saying “Jews run the world”. It’s not a conspiracy theory, it is a recognition that campaign funds are integral to a presidential election. If Biden can’t bring in money then his campaign will fold.

                • @Carrolade
                  link
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  Biden already possesses a huge amount of donor money, and cannot run again in the future. Additionally, Biden gets almost half his money from small donors.

                  https://www.opensecrets.org/2024-presidential-race/small-donors

                  Influence gained by donation and control are not the same thing. Influence is real. Control is conspiracy theory bullshit.